UiPath

UiPath interview process (2026)

Blog / UiPath interview process (2026)

UiPath software engineering interviews vary by role and team. The candidate reports below describe different combinations of algorithms, design, practical development and project discussions. They do not establish one standard interview sequence. This guide covers engineering jobs at UiPath, rather than certification tests or UiPath automation-developer jobs at other employers.

Coding and project discussion: A May 2026 SWE2 account, published in September, describes project architecture and messaging questions followed by Excel Sheet Column Title. A May 2025 mid-level account instead reports two hour-long DSA rounds. Practise explaining an approach and implementing it, while checking your own interview format with the recruiter.
Design and practical development: The May 2025 account describes a peer-to-peer expense-sharing design without persistent groups. A February 2026 SDE1 account reports building a configurable React autocomplete component. These are distinct role-specific exercises, not interchangeable stages of a universal process.
Experience and judgment: The February 2026 candidate reports two hiring-manager discussions about past projects, production debugging, pressure and practical AI use. Prepare concrete examples of your own work and explain the decisions you made. The behavioral material in the TechPrep roadmap is general preparation, not a list of confirmed UiPath questions.

The practice collection contains ten coding exercises and one low-level design exercise. Frontend tasks are discussed below as preparation prompts. They are not included in the graded question count.

Coding practice: Reported tasks covering grids, dynamic programming, arrays, binary search and scheduling.
Expense-sharing design: Model expenses and balances without inventing persistent groups.
Frontend preparation: Practise configurable autocomplete behavior and explain browser trade-offs.
Evidence and study plan: Understand the source dates, practice conventions and limits of this collection.

1. Coding practice

The May 2025 report names Number of Islands, Coin Change II, Burst Balloons and Subsets II. Its subset link explicitly allows duplicate input values. Our Subsets II exercise sorts each subset and the outer result to make grading deterministic. That ordering is a TechPrep convention.The February 2026 report also names Burst Balloons and Course Schedule III. Course Schedule III selects the maximum number of variable-duration courses that fit their deadlines. It is distinct from prerequisite graphs and reward-maximizing task scheduling.An April 2024 account supports Container With Most Water, Rotate Image and Search in Rotated Sorted Array. The May 2026 account links Excel Sheet Column Title, which converts a number into a column label.Escape a Large Maze comes from a June 2019 Seattle report. It is historical practice material, not evidence that the question is common in current interviews. Its sparse blocked cells require reasoning about bounded exploration rather than allocating the entire grid.

The May 2025 candidate describes an expense tracker without groups, with emphasis on design patterns and structure. Splitwise (Expense Sharing) provides TechPrep's executable practice model for users, expenses, pairwise balances and settlement. Its specific methods and equal-split rules are the practice exercise's contract, not a verbatim interview specification.The April 2024 account also mentions delivery-management and ATM design, but does not provide enough behavioral detail to justify linking a specific implementation here. Use those as requirements-gathering discussion prompts if they are relevant to your role.

3. Frontend preparation

In the February 2026 account, the candidate built a React input that fetched API data, filtered suggestions and filled the input after selection. The endpoint and filtering behavior had to be configurable. Practise separating fetching, filtering and selection, and be ready to explain alternative approaches.A frontend account posted in December 2025 describes an earlier interview with autocomplete interface design and a vanilla JavaScript implementation using local storage, debouncing and scroll-triggered loading. It also mentions unspecified array questions. Those details do not justify a particular array or trie question link. The dates and role scope differ from the February account.

4. Evidence and study plan

Candidate reports describe individual experiences. The collection combines reports from 2024 to 2026 with the clearly labelled 2019 maze question. Publication dates are not always interview dates. We make no claim about a universal round count, application timeline or question frequency.The practice collection excludes vague tasks, unsupported company tags and sources about other employers. The source notes also distinguish reported tasks from the exact contracts used by the practice exercises.Use the UiPath interview roadmap to organize the coding and low-level design exercises alongside TechPrep's general behavioral questions. Start with tasks relevant to your role, explain solutions aloud and bring examples of project decisions, debugging and collaboration. Confirm your actual process with your recruiter.

Conclusion

Combine focused algorithm practice with the design or frontend work your role requires. The UiPath interview roadmap brings the reviewed practice set into one adjustable study plan.

1. Coding practice

The February 2026 report also names Burst Balloons and Course Schedule III. Course Schedule III selects the maximum number of variable-duration courses that fit their deadlines. It is distinct from prerequisite graphs and reward-maximizing task scheduling.

Escape a Large Maze comes from a June 2019 Seattle report. It is historical practice material, not evidence that the question is common in current interviews. Its sparse blocked cells require reasoning about bounded exploration rather than allocating the entire grid.

2. Expense-sharing design

The April 2024 account also mentions delivery-management and ATM design, but does not provide enough behavioral detail to justify linking a specific implementation here. Use those as requirements-gathering discussion prompts if they are relevant to your role.

3. Frontend preparation

A frontend account posted in December 2025 describes an earlier interview with autocomplete interface design and a vanilla JavaScript implementation using local storage, debouncing and scroll-triggered loading. It also mentions unspecified array questions. Those details do not justify a particular array or trie question link. The dates and role scope differ from the February account.

4. Evidence and study plan

The practice collection excludes vague tasks, unsupported company tags and sources about other employers. The source notes also distinguish reported tasks from the exact contracts used by the practice exercises.

Use the UiPath interview roadmap to organize the coding and low-level design exercises alongside TechPrep's general behavioral questions. Start with tasks relevant to your role, explain solutions aloud and bring examples of project decisions, debugging and collaboration. Confirm your actual process with your recruiter.